Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co." Results 241 - 260 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
It appeared in the National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse Update earlier this year, before our appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
According to an amicus brief tendered in this case by the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters and the Texas Association of Insurance Adjusters, forty-five states plus the District of Columbia have enacted such statutes.[6] Chapter 4102 expressly prohibits a "person" from acting as a public insurance adjuster in Texas without a license. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
According to an amicus brief tendered in this case by the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters and the Texas Association of Insurance Adjusters, forty-five states plus the District of Columbia have enacted such statutes.[6] Chapter 4102 expressly prohibits a "person" from acting as a public insurance adjuster in Texas without a license. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The defendant played the sound recording as the soundtrack to its national advertising campaign, and also had ads and signs at stores stating, “Jeans Like That,” “Denim Like That,” “Shoes Like That,” and so on. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Read the National Union of Journalists summary here. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am by Aurora Barnes
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am by Sean Wajert
This is a version of the so-called “stream-of-commerce” doctrine of jurisdiction, discussed by a plurality of the court in Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On the other hand, both the High Court of Australia (Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106, [1992] HCA 45 (30 September 1992)) and the European Court of Human Rights (Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v Switzerland (No 1) 24699/94, (2002) 34 EHRR 159, [2001] ECHR 412 (28 June 2001); TV Vest As & Rogaland Pensjonistparti v Norway 21132/05, (2009) 48 EHRR 51, [2008] ECHR 1687 (11 December 2008); Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT)… [read post]