Search for: "State v. Parcel" Results 241 - 260 of 1,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 4:06 am by Patricia Salkin
The court stated that even assuming that JDBY’s nonreligious comparators are “assemblies,” they were not suitable comparators to JDBY from the standpoint of RLUIPA. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 4:43 am by Patricia Salkin
Petitioner submitted a site plan application in 2001 to construct numerous commercial and residential buildings on an undeveloped parcel of land in the Town of Riverhead. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
On its arrival in Denmark, the parcel was inspected by the customs authorities: they suspended customs clearance, suspecting that it was counterfeit and that it infringed copyright, and told both Rolex and Blomqvist accordingly.In keeping with the procedure laid down by Customs Regulation 1383/2003, Rolex sought the continued suspension of customs clearance, established that the watch was in fact counterfeit and then asked Blomqvist to consent to its destruction. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Gold v. [read post]