Search for: "State v. Pari"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2021, 7:22 pm
Victim states assume responsibility for their own conduct that aggravates harm caused illegally by another state. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:57 am
Grovit and West Tankers v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Paris prosecutors opened their own inquiry into the claims. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:22 am
Hulley Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:43 am
Corcamore, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1] Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as licensing Roberts v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
Not everyone shares the same world view, expectaitons, and experiences of those brought up among the best that Berlin, Paris, or New York ccan offer those with means enough to enjoy them. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:09 pm
Ct. 1659 (2013), as well as Lubbe v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am
The claimants argued that, reliant on M v Newham [2020] EWHC 32, the duty was immediate, unqualified and non-deferrable. [read post]
16 May 2021, 1:15 pm
That is the question considered in a pending lawsuit, Tormasi v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:35 pm
Š. v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:03 pm
State v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 2:42 pm
v=R6z8F5ZJa4wI hope you will enjoy watching these events during these times [read post]
