Search for: "State v. Payne"
Results 241 - 260
of 415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
California and, with Justice Souter joining, Zamudio v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:01 pm
Payne (1968) 261 Cal.App.2d 403, 408; C.C.P. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Payne v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm
Ostergren v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:47 pm
The Court hasn’t opined on this subject since the 1991 case of Payne v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:33 am
Payne, 36 Va. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
(4) Cause of Action Inst. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
Payne, 2006 WL 2844415, *2 (W.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
Although both lines ultimately trace back to Brandeis’ Coronado Oil dissent, this part demonstrates how the contemporary conflict effectively emerged out of a key debate between Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thurgood Marshall in 1991’s Payne v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
(relisted after the Sept. 26, Oct. 6, Oct. 13, Oct. 27 and Nov. 3 conferences) Payne v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:39 am
Payne, ___ N.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:56 am
Thus, in Payne v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:02 am
A lawsuit filed in Payne v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
” [Payne, supra, 186 N.J. at 335.] [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm
" Payne v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Payne v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:34 am
However, the cases of Ferguson v IC(EA/2010/0085) (on which, see my post here) and Brett v IC (EA/2008/0098) imposed an important gloss on that principle. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:19 am
Similarly, victim impact statements--upheld by a conservative Supreme Court majority in Payne v. [read post]
