Search for: "State v. Porting" Results 241 - 260 of 2,093
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:04 am by Anna Carrier (BE)
Similar investment services restrictions also apply to dealings with Russian legal persons, entities or bodies established in Russia engaged in the conception, production, sales or export of military equipment or services, as well as certain state-owned entities (Almaz-Antey; Kamaz; Novorossiysk Commercial Sea Port; Rostec (Russian Technologies State Corporation); Russian Railways; JSC PO Sevmash; Sovcomflot; and United Shipbuilding Corporation). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:57 am by Leland Garvin
This goes all the way back to 1920 and the Florida Supreme Court decision in Anderson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:57 am by Leland Garvin
This goes all the way back to 1920 and the Florida Supreme Court decision in Anderson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:27 am by Michael C. Petta
Moreover, unlike the seizure of M/V Wise Honest in 2018, in the present situation, the U.N. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:20 am
The destruction of our country, the destruction of Europe all American ports should be close for Russian goods. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm by Kristyn Melvin and Matt Bonovich
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for… [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:16 am by Katherine Pompilio
  The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the U.S. government in FBI v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
  The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]