Search for: "State v. R. Hope"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Carey's demand for more and more, wider and wider, and hope-springs-eternal discovery, the court warned him that he would be sanctioned if the depositions were not meaningful and productive," the judge said in Vioni v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
The introduction of s.12 of the Human Rights Act in 1998 caused some claimant lawyers to raise their hopes that the test had been lowered, stating as it does that applications for interim relief that restrict the exercise of Article 10 could be ordered if “the court is satisfied that the applicant is likely to establish that publication should not be allowed” (s.12(3)). [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am
*State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:31 pm
In Pearson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
The rejection of the broader based challenge was a common theme in this case and the next, R(Faarah) v Southwark LBC. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:03 am
The promoters of the Washington conclave recognized that it would not have Article V powers, but they hoped that if it did reach agreement, the political pressure on Congress would be sufficient to induce it to respond in kind. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:39 am
Koch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
Last week, SCHR filed five motions for summary judgment in Whitaker v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:36 am
Obama v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 7:09 am
We can only hope that this will be the result of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:41 am
R. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:30 am
Marshall v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:41 am
Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Vincent Howard believes that seems to have been the case in United States. v. [read post]
