Search for: "State v. R. V. B."
Results 241 - 260
of 15,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 10:41 am
R. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
R. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am
The case of R v Butler held that material that is not obscene under this framework does not become so by reason of the person to whom it is shown, or the place of manner in which it is shown. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
R. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am
, B & B Hardware v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Kim, Tanya R. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” State of Maryland v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Islam & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Haringey (2022) EWHC 3933 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Haringey’s refusal to award Mr Islam Band A priority on its housing register, rather than Band B. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
She then instructed solicitors ho made further representations, including that it had been held that the benefits cap “indirectly discriminated against women over men” (citing the Supreme Court decision in R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21, [2019] 1 WLR 3289). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
” Testa v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
Alaska R. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
R. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
More than Criminalization, not yet Women’s Constituional Right, (En Hübner Mendes, C. y Gargarella, R. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
State v. [read post]