Search for: "State v. Ramming" Results 241 - 260 of 523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
Prisoners (as in Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 913),conscripts (Álvarez Ramón v Spain (application no 51192/99) 3 July 2001) and mental patients (Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437) are in a different position because the deprivation of liberty imparts more responsibility on the authorities concerned to ensure that any consequent suicidal ideation is properly dealt with. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The code states that “disclosure of information from surveillance systems must be controlled and consistent with the purpose(s) for which the system was established“. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 3:59 am
We might mention that a Full Bench of the Delhi High Court in Bardu Ram Dhanna Ram v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:29 am by Peter Margulies
” As Judge Gorsuch noted in dissenting from the denial of rehearing in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:03 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Constitution of the United States guarantees a right to remain silent, right? [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]