Search for: "State v. Ramming" Results 241 - 260 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 12:44 pm
News of the massive airbag recall is making waves across the automotive industry this week as new estimates suggest that over 7.8 million vehicles are potentially affected in the United States alone. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:03 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Constitution of the United States guarantees a right to remain silent, right? [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:36 am by Joy Waltemath
The opt-in plaintiffs in Lagos were from 15 different sales offices, operating under 28 regional sales managers and 12 sales directors, the court stated, noting that the issue before the Lagos court was whether RAMs and GAMs from across the country were similarly situated. [read post]
In more than 60% of the raids the ACLU investigated, SWAT members rammed down doors in search of possible drugs, not to save a hostage, respond to a barricade situation, or neutralize an active shooter. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
Transformations presents an elaborate account of the ways in which the Reconstruction Congress ordered the military governments of the South to ram the Fourteenth Amendment through state legislatures of the former Confederacy – playing fast and loose with the rules and principles of Article five in an increasingly desperate effort to gain a semblance of “ratification” before the voters would have a chance to return to the polls in 1868. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Since the established practice was followed, there was no question of any illegality or unconstitutionality.The decision in AK Subbaiah v Karnataka Legislature Secretariat may also be noted. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:45 am by Patrick Goold
” Some have questioned whether this statement is consistent with a previous Ninth Circuit case of MAI Systems v Peak Corp., 991 F.2d 551 (1993). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]