Search for: "State v. Risk"
Results 241 - 260
of 28,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 6:29 am
ShareOn Tuesday, the justices will hear oral argument in Golan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:59 am
A defendant in a DWI case, State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 10:18 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:31 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:42 am
’ ” Blondin II, 189 F.3d at 246 (quoting Friedrich v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:02 pm
As a result, some patients are forced to endure significant risks or must travel out of state if they want to end a pregnancy. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
And significantly, we have repeatedly held … that “no danger is more commonly realized or risk appreciated than that of falling.'”Valdosta State Univ. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
[Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20] In Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 12:25 pm
But the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:44 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:06 pm
Turner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 6:24 am
See Golan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In Nakkhumpun v. [read post]
