Search for: "State v. Royal"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that the Government’s attempt to effect these changes using the royal prerogative offends the imperative rule of our constitution. 15.18 The Lord Advocate for the Scottish Government, the Rt Hon W. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
In the Cogeco Cable Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:12 pm
by Julian Ku I am participating this week in a discussion on Kiobel v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm
State Immunity, Violation of Human Rights and the Individual’s Right for Reparations – A Comment on the ICJ’s Judgment of February 2, 2012 (Germany v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:20 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
by Melbourne Journal of International Law We are grateful to Justine Nolan for her thoughtful comments on the article, and in particular for highlighting two recent circuit court cases – Flomo v Firestone Natural Rubber Co in the Seventh Circuit and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation in the DC Circuit – which affirm that corporations can be liable under the Alien Tort Statute (‘ATS’), contrary to the position of the Second Circuit majority in Kiobel… [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:54 pm
Petition for certiorari was granted in Royal v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
The procedural safeguards available to the individual will be especially material in determining whether the respondent State has, when fixing the regulatory framework, remained within its margin of appreciation. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:06 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Yetkin v London Borough of Newham [2010] EWCA Civ 776 (13 July 2010) Badger Trust v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWCA Civ 807 (13 July 2010) Ghadami & Anor v Lyon Cole Insurance Group Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 767 (13 July 2010) FlooHorridge (t/a Newford Parts Centre) v Downshire House (Reproductions) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 777 (13 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1620 (13… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:01 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers v Serco Ltd (t/a Serco Docklands) [2011] EWCA Civ 226 (04 March 2011) MN (Tanzania), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 193 (04 March 2011) H v City & County of Swansea & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 195 (02 March 2011) RO, R (on the application of) v East Riding of Yorkshire Council & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2013) impaired counts based on the Alien Tort Statute; similarly, the Court’s ruling in Mohamad v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:21 pm
Oklahoma v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harrison, R (on the application of) v Birmingham Magistrate’s Court & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 332 (25 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v MK (Tunisia) [2011] EWCA Civ 333 (25 March 2011) Brook v Reed [2011] EWCA Civ 331 (25 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bowker & Anor (t/a Lagopus Services) v The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds [2011] EWHC 737… [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
