Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 241 - 260
of 71,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 2:41 am
Supreme Court Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Constantine, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2406 (26 October 2010) T, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 (26 October 2010) Wakeling, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2210 (15 September 2010) Qayum, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2237 (16 September 2010) Cooper, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2335 (20… [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:49 am
Kansas once again struck down the state's school funding practices. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm
North Carolina, which may decide the fate of North Carolina's Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP), the state’s school voucher program. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:22 pm
The 7th Circuit’s approach appears to have begin with a flippant ruling by Judge Easterbrook in Nisenbaum v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 3:28 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Richards, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1841 (23 July 2008) Cooper, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1856 (31 July 2008) Norman, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1810 (31 July 2008) B & Ors, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1997 (15 August 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Dragonfly Consultancy Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2008] EWHC 2113 (Ch) (03 September 2008) High Court (Commercial Court)… [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 19-20 January 2016. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:57 am
The question presented in the case is twofold: (1) whether a state violates the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4-R Act) by “discriminating against a rail carrier” when it requires rail carriers to pay a sales-and-use tax but exempts railroads’ competitors from paying the same tax; and (2) whether, in resolving a claim of unlawful tax discrimination under the 4-R Act, a court should consider the… [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:47 pm
Evid., justifies vacation of lengthy sentence: United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Opinion by Judge Dale R. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:52 am
Supreme Court FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 22 (25 May 2011) SK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 23 (25 May 2011) Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC 24 (25 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Spencer, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1231 (20 April 2011) Thomas, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1295 (25 May 2011) Court of Appeal… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Governor John R. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am
Governor John R. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:32 am
R. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:56 am
Here's the abstract: The United States Supreme [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 1:40 am
State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:15 am
R. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
