Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 241 - 260 of 56,750
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
Thibaut Lesseliers, Strasbourg Observers: Föderation der Aleviten Gemeinden in Österreich v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Medication abortion, which makes up the majority of abortions obtained in the United States, emerged as a national political flashpoint after the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
The panel said that, “[u]sing the tools of history and tradition to which the Supreme Court directed us in [District of Columbia v.] [read post]
24 May 2024, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
Ben Beadle of the NRLA said If true, it is hugely disappointing that this Bill will not now make it into law. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court, she said, is required to give such findings “significant deference” as long as they are “plausible. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
The same could be said of individual states, where there is an apparent ideological divide between which states pursue climate claims and which do not. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
All it means, as Khan said in an interview Monday, is that “no people anywhere are saints. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
When evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43… [read post]