Search for: "State v. Soto" Results 241 - 260 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:33 am
"   PIP INSURER MAY RECOUP ITS PAYOUTS EVEN IF INSURED IS NOT MADE WHOLE"The state Supreme Court on Thursday narrowly upheld a decade-old doctrine that says PIP carriers are entitled to be reimbursed by a tortfeasor's carrier, even if that means the injured plaintiff will not be made whole. 'Simply because the conclusion diminishes the total amount available to the victim from the tortfeasor's policy of insurance does not produce an… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:57 pm
Soto, 1007, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 5604; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:08 am
’s Messenger program infringed asserted claims and infringement was wilful: Creative Internet Advertising v Yahoo! [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 am
Well, there are a couple of prior Ninth Circuit cases that fairly clearly state that in such an event, you remand with instructions to adjudicate the petition on the assumption that the petitioner is credible; for example, a 1994 case called Guo, which stated: "Where an appellate court has heldthat an IJ's or BIA's adverse credibility finding is not supported by substantial evidence . . . the proper procedure is to remand the case to the BIA for further… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:19 pm
On September 23, 2008, the New Jersey Supreme Court entertained oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]