Search for: "State v. South" Results 241 - 260 of 11,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 5:53 am by Justin Cosgrove
Judge Mary Geiger Lewis determined that the state's act preventing the placement of both parents' names went against the Supreme Court [official website] decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
" The complaint (full text) in Gender and Sexuality Alliance v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:58 am by Charles Mathis
In this episode of my blog series we’re headed to South Carolina, the Palmetto State, to define insurable interests. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:45 pm by Patrick A. Malone
The Justice Department is investigating the state under federal laws affirmed by the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:00 am
So ordered the High Court of South Africa Tuesday, in its judgment in South African Litigation Centre and Zimbabwe Exiles Forum v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:43 am by John Rich and Beth L. Fowler
In a long awaited decision reversing 26 years of existing precedent, on June 21st the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota  v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:13 am
Fourth Circuit holds that the South Carolina Regulation of Manufacturers, Distributors and Dealers Act does not extend to sales consummated in another stateIn CAROLINA TRUCKS v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:45 am by Gregory Forman
In a criminal appeal that has implications for family law attorneys who defend abuse and neglect proceedings, on August 5, 2015, in the case of State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:30 am by Bernard Clark
The Supreme Court of South Carolina abandoned the contributory negligence rule in the 1991 case of Nelson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 1:56 pm
Brown could be facing charges in a number of countries; it remains to be seen, however, what future actions will be taken.[1] Susan Watts, Stem Cell Treatment Warning, BBC, Aug. 30, 2006.[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] See United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]