Search for: "State v. Standing Soldier" Results 241 - 260 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
Very much a stand against the protesters and rioters... without mentioning them. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Demagogues break into the oligarchy by rallying popular forces, promising redistribution or simply using personal wealth to buy support in the streets, or among mercenary soldiers. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That explains some of the wisest decisions, like the Court’s rejection of a right of soldiers to determine their headgear by faith in Goldman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Steele's standing order to "KILL ALL MILITARY AGED MALES" had leaked to the press.The frenetic activity that erupted to shield senior officers from examination and embarrassment locked-up Ray Girouard and his men in Fort Leavenworth.EARLY INVESTIGATIONSBrigadier General Thomas Maffey (one-star flag officer) was an early actor taking notes, gathering facts, interviewing soldiers who fought at Iron Triangle, taking their official statements.The Army Criminal… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
But does it require a realignment of U.S. soldiers in the region, who are there to respond to a threat from Iran? [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
Ominously, soldiers will return to the streets for the first time since an earthquake devastated parts of the country in 2010. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am by Susan Hennessey
Upcoming Proceedings and Developments in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
It is headed by an "ex-bishop" -- a statement which has truth value only within the limited (but, hey -- "inclusive") confines of ECUSA, and not at all within the wider Anglican Communion, the majority of whose provinces treat ECUSA as the "renegade," and regard those whom ECUSA evicts as faithful soldiers for Christ, whose eviction is a badge of merit.Next, there was no "postponement," in the sense of agreeing upon a date on which to take up the injunction again. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” Moreover, Scalia was not merely making a reluctant nod to reality, instead noting that “our standing army is the pride of our Nation. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]