Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 241 - 260
of 49,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2007, 10:01 pm
Younger abstention bars a federal civil action against a search that is still under investigation by state officials. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:21 am
Can one be flip, yet still sincere? [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:47 am
See State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
For my money, the most interesting is Yates v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
Bode or State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:23 pm
Related articles 60 Years After ‘Brown,’ What Still Divides America’s Classrooms? [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
After State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
There are three possibilities: First, under the doctrine of Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), a copyright owner can still sue a state in federal court for a prospective injunction requiring state officials to cease a continuing violation of federal copyright law. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
The State also argued under Norris v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:05 pm
Sawyers was whether a non-citizen who cannot himself meet the requirements to avoid deportation (to have lived in the United States for at least seven years and have been lawful permanent resident for at least five years) can nevertheless avoid deportation if while still a minor he lived with a parent who could meet these requirements. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:16 pm
And yet, Concepcion has changed nothing in that a thorough, case-by-case analysis of the applicable state law doctrine of unconscionability, applied to the specific terms of an arbitration agreement, is still required. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
