Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 241 - 260
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
As in Missouri v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
The majority held that the error was prejudicial, and the state court’s contrary conclusion was an objectively unreasonable application of the governing case, Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In last week’s post, we explored how the case of Adnan Syed serves as a powerful vehicle to teach Strickland v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
Wrinkles instead claimed that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
The court will determine whether Appellant's counsel rendered deficient performance and, if so, whether such deficiency prejudiced Appellant under Strickland v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Strickland v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:05 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 12:48 pm
Strickland, decided by this Court on March 2, 2007, and has joined in the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing En Banc, currently pending before this Court, see Cooey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:13 am
The United States Supreme Court decided Hinton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:29 pm
Strickland, No. 07-3600, that Ohio Rev. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
SEE STRICKLAND v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:42 pm
See Stang v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:53 am
The standard for the 3.850 claim is set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court's interpretation under AEDPA and whether the state court's interpretation of Florida v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
I believe Strickland is clear enough that the answer is "yes," but there is enough of a circuit split for the high court to take it up.Maslenjak v. [read post]
