Search for: "State v. T. P. D."
Results 241 - 260
of 3,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
The court stated the facts surrounding the policy not being supplied to the policyholder: Quinn also noted that the ‘Scottsdale/Nationwide adjuster has a different copy of the [P]olicy for some reason. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Table of Contents State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: Top Marginal State Income Tax Rates Table: 2023 State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets Notable 2023 State Individual Income Tax Changes Historical State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2015-2023 Individual income taxes are a major source of state government revenue, accounting for 40 percent of state tax collections. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 7:59 am
’” She also argued, again without citing any legal authority, that “[p]lacing the burden on [the decedent ] to request a change in the coverage Liberty [Mut [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Laws, ch. 140, § 131(d) (2020). 2124. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Steinman and Brian T. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Steinman and Brian T. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 7:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Bhanu, Paul T. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
See [State Farm Mutual v] Hanania, [261 So. 3d 684] at 687 [Fla. 1st DCA 2018]. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:49 am
Perhaps it will inform its work; more likely it will inform it of the state of mind of those willing and able to supply input. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
In 2016, Leonard v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Example: allowing descriptive terms with acquired distinctiveness to be “trademarks” is realist; common law/1905 Act required D sell goods of “same descriptive properties” as P for infringement, but Lanham Act eliminated that requirement, which is now just a LOC factor. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:56 am
Albert’s Diamond Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
You can read more on The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, if you'd like. [read post]
