Search for: "State v. TM" Results 241 - 260 of 740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am by Dennis Crouch
For “expressive works” accused of improper TM use, the 9th Circuit follows the balancing test of Rogers v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
More likely the state will do what elites do everywhere--they ignore these engagements and to the extent possible undermine their authors. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Among other things, this case has some interesting things to say about IIC and proper controls in survey cases.Alzheimer’s Disease & Related Disorders Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
INS: speech the state can’t regulate—how far are we from having no distinction b/t commercial and noncommercial speech? [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]