Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice" Results 241 - 260 of 700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:12 am
The exclusionary rule in the United States is considerably more restrictive of police behavior than its counterparts elsewhere in the world. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:08 pm
John's United Church of Christ v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
  In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  Federal law makes it a crime, Katyal said, and President Obama has “stated unequivocally that the United States does not engage in torture. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:49 am
Justices Stevens and Breyer wrote separate concurring opinions.Everyone expected that the majority opinion would be authored by departing Justice Stevens as his final decision, and it appears likely that the Court had earlier imagined that his opinion would collect majority approval; so it was a surprise, to me at least, that (a) Stevens' strike would have put the ball squarely in the net to knock out business method patents, though (b) his… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
" Human Rights Watch says the United States has 2,574 inmates serving life terms for crimes they committed before age 18. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
” The Department of Justice filed a brief Friday urging the Court to dismiss Kiyemba v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten issued a ruling in Zacharius v. [read post]