Search for: "Strickland v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2008, 12:58 am
"
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 8:00 am
In Strickland v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
Pinholster v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
United States ; United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:09 pm
Connecticut, of course, also treats sex offender registration as regulatory rather than a punitive measure (State v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
The Court emphasized the high level of deference that federal habeas courts must show to state-court decisions on the merits, particularly state-court decisions rejecting Jackson v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:17 am
Ed. 2d 657 (1984), or, in the alternative, that he had failed to show deficient performance and prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
Under 1984’s Strickland v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:10 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), his counsel should have raised a Sixth Amendment challenge to the sentencing enhancements, even though Nichols was sentenced in 2002, more than two years before the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
Petitioner, a prisoner at the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, seeks habeas corpus relief on the ground that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during court-martial proceedings. [read post]
