Search for: "Strickland v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:25 am
Carl Folsom, III and Carol Longenecker Schmidt won in State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Title: Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Title: Strickland v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
United States, the Rehnquist court wrote: In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:15 pm
Although the Court found that counsel performed deficiently under Strickland v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm
Osborne states the issue for this Court’s consideration as follows:Was Shawn Osborne denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to properly investigate and secure expert testimony thereby violating the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the requirements of Strickland v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:28 pm
United States, 486 U.S. 153, 159 (1988). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:40 pm
” See also United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum – an Alien Tort Statute case involving a violation of the law of nations and whether a corporation can be a defendant in an Alien Tort Statute action; United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
The United States Court of Appeals has published a couple of interesting opinions in the last few days. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
