Search for: "Subpoena Duces Tecum"
Results 241 - 260
of 444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
The 11th Circuit just decided In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum March 25, 2011, USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
The Eleventh Circuit held, today, that a person cannot be compelled to unencrypt encrypted files under the Fifth Amendment in In re Subpoena Duces Tecum issued March 25, 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) The important decision is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
., for instance, asked Verrilli if the government could criminalize lying about whether one received a high school diploma.In other news, the 11th Circuit came out with a fascinating opinion today (In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011 USA v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm
Id. at 1414, citing In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910 (8th Cir. 1997); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, (D.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:13 pm
Rogers, Jr. issued Order No. 14 denying non-party AT&T Mobility LLC’s (“AT&T”) motion to quash and/or limit a subpoena duces tecum issued at the request of Complainant Openwave Systems, Inc. in Certain Devices for Mobile Data Communication (Inv. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm
It was a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:43 pm
As previously noted, one section of the statute (section 542) amends Article 47 to allow subpoenas duces tecum to be issued for Article 32 investigations. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:37 pm
As a result of the President’s signature, starting tomorrow, subpoenas duces tecum can be issued to obtain evidence for Article 32 investigations. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
., Appellee. 2nd District.Public employees -- Drug testing -- Discovery -- Subpoena duces tecum -- Non-profit advocacy organization moved to quash subpoenas for documents in connection with action challenging constitutionality of mandatory drug testing of state employees -- Motion to quash is denied in part with respect to documents that are publicly available on the organization's website and responsive to defendant's request -- Authentication of these… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
The web page of the Virginia State Bar reports: On December 27, 2011, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board administratively suspended [an attorney's] license to practice law for failing to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued by the bar.... [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:23 am
The opinion notes that Emch testified “pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum,” which means she was subpoenaed to testify and to bring evidence with her. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:15 pm
Organon’s (collectively, “Merck”) motion to quash subpoenas ad testificandum and duces tecum directed to Dr. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:56 pm
One of these devices is the subpoena duces tecum reproduced below. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:08 pm
Finally, Article 47 (Refusal to appear or testify) would be expanded to included the case of a subpoena duces tecum for an Article 32 investigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
Obviously, this exception would not apply to any document which could be obtained through subpoena duces tecum or deposition discovery subpoena. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
Before trial, Defendants served the above mentioned paralegal with a subpoena duces tecum commanding production of all emails between herself and the plaintiff during the timeframe of the spoliation. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:44 am
This blog is inspired by myriad important family law issues that current South Carolina case law and statute don’t adequately answer. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, 228 F.3d 341, 348 (4th Cir. 2000) (discussing practical distinctions between search warrant and grand jury subpoena). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
On a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum or for a protective order, in assessing whether the circumstances or reasons for a particular demand warrant discovery from a nonparty, those circumstances and reasons need not be shown to be "special circumstances. [read post]
