Search for: "Superior Court v. Civil Service Commission" Results 241 - 260 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
The Court found that the superior court therefore exceeded the scope of its review when reversing under these circumstances. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
-based services, such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel and Mailchimp, IAPP reports. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am by stevemehta
No. 30-2008-00108123)   O P I N I O N   Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kirk H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of      Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of      Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
” (Attorney General Eric Holder, April 11, 2012) “This was competition on the merits, with Apple providing a superior reading platform on a beautiful 10 inch iPad screen, with color, multi-media, and fixed display, and access to millions of future iPad purchasers. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, in 2007 the (former) Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) asked the bookstores Borders and Waterstones to stop selling the book, in response to a complaint it had received. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:10 am by 1 Crown Office Row
I also learned in government that it’s best to avoid complexity in your answers, if possible: it’s generally unwanted, and often interpreted as proof that you’re a typical civil service ditherer, whose view can be ignored. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal also reviewed these provisions in R. v. [read post]