Search for: "Sweat v. Does" Results 241 - 260 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2011, 3:20 am by SHG
Rubinstein posts about a New York Supreme Court decision, Finkel v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
Union of India & Others AIR 1987 SC 1086, this Court observed that Article 32 does not merely confer power on this Court to issue direction, order or writ for the enforcement of fundamental rights. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Gene Quinn
I frequently ask myself why it is that patents continue to come under attack by those who want to pretend they are only a burden on society and provide no benefit. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
 Under copyright law, "originality" does not have to be creative though, as the courts have affirmed -- though they sometimes get it wrong, as in Hadley v Kemp in 1999 (the 'Spandau Ballet' case). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 76 million incidents of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am by Elie Mystal
The big-time lawyers in the office work on the 19th floor:The very sad truth is THE KCDA DOES NOT CARE about bed bugs-as long as the beg bugs stay off the 19th floor. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:05 am by lawmrh
But at such rarefied air, you can’t sweat details let alone devils. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:46 am by Venkat
"  Kevin Thompson ("FTC v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm by Steven Titch
Put another way, what future does the FCC have if it can’t regulate broadband? [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am by Barry Eagar
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:02 am by Theo Francis
This week, we turn to Las Vegas Sands (LVS), where the company and its board clearly know how to sweat the small stuff — while paying out the big bucks to select high-rollers in the corner office. [read post]