Search for: "THE STATE v. MOON"
Results 241 - 260
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2016, 2:08 pm
The partner who grew up on a Dictaphone and banker boxes is not going to proceed in a state of perpetual amazement that she can access all the world's knowledge and all of her firm's files from a $600 computer that weighs 5 oz., fits in her pocket, and performs 120,000,000x faster than the $23,000,000 computer that weighed 600 lbs. and guided Apollo 11 to the moon. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:27 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:37 pm
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
That’s Washington v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
In the case of ISIS, it was, somewhat surprisingly, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
Read the warning from the State Department here. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:21 pm
United States and Jeffries v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:43 am
Just last October, in Parent v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Kermit V. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court created in its divided Rapanos v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:37 am
Supreme Court created in its divided Rapanos v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 3:37 pm
Cir. 2003) and Jacobs v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:49 am
Article V of the Outer Space Treaty denotes astronauts as “envoys of humankind”, and creates an obligation to assist the astronauts of another State which crash on one’s own territory or on the high seas; or if a State has astronauts of its own in space who can help the astronauts of another State in space, they must do so. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Wright, After Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
And if you believe that, I have some real estate on the moon I would like to sell you. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
* Digital files "property", says court in "female patronage" caseFrom Katfriend Ken Moon (IP/IT consultant to AJ Park, Auckland, New Zealand) comes this most helpful analysis of Jonathan Dixon v The Queen [2015] NZSC 147,a New Zealand Supreme Court ruling that goes further than traditional British rulings by analogising digital files to "property". [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
From Katfriend Ken Moon (IP/IT consultant to AJ Park, Auckland, New Zealand) comes this most helpful analysis of Jonathan Dixon v The Queen [2015] NZSC 147, a New Zealand Supreme Court ruling that goes further than traditional British rulings by analogising digital files to "property". [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]