Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 241 - 260
of 35,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the California appellate court to be resolved in accordance with this holding. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm
” Much of Monday’s argument focused on the Supreme Court’s 1962 ruling in Robinson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
California, 413 U.S. 15, 24 (1973). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 728 (1999), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the doctrine was adopted by our country’s Founders in the Constitution itself rather than the Eleventh Amendment, solidifying its place in American jurisprudence. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
California, in which the Supreme Court held that laws imposing penalties on people for narcotics addiction violated the Eighth Amendment because they punished a state of being, not a specific action, like drug possession or sale. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
MSC appealed, arguing the court lacked personal jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm
Watson (1981) 30 Cal.3d 290, (Watson), the California Supreme Court concluded that a person who kills another while driving under the influence of alcohol may be charged with second degree murder if the circumstances support a finding of implied malice. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
CSI Electrical Contractors and issued from the Supreme Court of California. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:52 pm
" And the Supreme Court stated in D.C. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As recognized by the California Supreme Court, this is an unwaivable right by employees. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
California, the city continues, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment prohibited the state from making it a crime simply to be a drug addict in California, even if there was no proof that the defendant had ever used drugs in the state. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing MSN – Jan Wolfe and C. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm
“To date, neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have addressed whether the compelled use of a biometric to unlock an electronic device is testimonial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
Between May 2022 when the Supreme Court accidentally leaked the draft memo and the following June when the case was decided, there was a mad scramble to figure out what the impacts would be. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
Similarly, the Supreme Court ruled just a few years ago that California had to compensate employers after it forced them to let union representatives access their property. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm
"To date, neither the Supreme Court nor any of our sister circuits have addressed whether the compelled use of a biometric to unlock an electronic device is testimonial. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:49 am
Supreme Court decision updated the federal religious accommodation test in Groff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
Code, § 5909 based upon Supreme Court holdings that a summary denial of a petition for reconsideration is inconsistent with Lab. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
The recent ruling by the California Supreme Court in Estrada v. [read post]
