Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by and through its Judges" Results 241 - 260 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
As a general rule, Supreme Court Justices speak through their opinions. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
Texas, a Supreme Court decision from 2017, to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Judge Frederick Scullin’s opinion carefully walks through the Supreme Court’s precedents of District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The firm had earlier reported its lobbying through the Lobbying Disclosure Act in 2018 after it was retained then by Hikvision. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Kyle Kroll
The district court judge denied North Coast’s motion to dismiss the case, stating that the factual record underlying the dispute needs to be fleshed out before any of the estate’s claims can be decided. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
Bell, On the Waterfront: Was a Post on this Page the Genesis of an Original Action in the Supreme Court? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 4:11 am by David DePaolo
The act evidently is intended as a just settlement of a difficult problem, affecting one of the most important of social relations, and it is to be judged in its entirety. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “examines the 2017 term [Supreme Court] case pipelines to see how partisanship helps us predict how judges vote in complex cases. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
Abuse & Neglect: NEGLECT FINDING REQUIRES PROOF OF MENTAL STATE, DELAWARE SUPREME COURT FINDS, Dep't of Health & Social Servs. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Through this final rule, HHS makes its addiction treatment guidance issued during the COVID-19 pandemic permanent. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
We’re now in the middle of the Supreme Court’s nearly month-long midwinter hiatus between conferences. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Though the state supreme court held that, as a matter of state law, the trial court erred in conducting the hearing ex parte, it determined that the errors were harmless. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Initially, the district court in Oklahoma denied Hobby Lobby’s request for an injunction, and the district court in Pennsylvania denied Conestoga’s request. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Supreme Court Has Chipped Away at the Voting Rights Act for 9 Years. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 10:42 am by John Floyd
Yet our society and our Constitution generally have made the judgment that the measure of a fair trial is its adherence to stated processes. [read post]