Search for: "THOMAS P. KENNEDY" Results 241 - 260 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm by Marty Lederman
Kennedy, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, this year I also assigned two other readings:  a 1998 article co-written by Amy V. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Kennedy and Thomas only seemed to reinforce that position on Wednesday; Thomas remained silent, but had given no indication earlier of a change of mind. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
at the Kennedy Center from June 1-20, Tony Mauro reports at the BLT. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Jon
A page of discussion and links is here.Among the majority, 4, Alito, Roberts, Scalia, and Kennedy, decided only on the basis of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck asks whether “[a]s a normative matter (that is, without regard to historical or doctrinal foundations), … Justice Kennedy’s case against judge-made damages remedies for constitutional violations [is] actually convincing. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:49 pm by Bill Otis
 The answer is no, for reasons explained by Justice Alito in his four-member dissent in Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:14 am by Eric Turkewitz
Wilson, attorney in private practice (Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP) – HarvardStephen P. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Andrew Chung at Reuters, who reports that “Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas issued a brief order urging lower courts to reconsider an earlier ruling that barred the creditors from recovering the payments. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
  Justice Thomas had the least to say, "not even clearing his throat" and Justice Kennedy, the eventual author of the opinion, said little. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
P. 23(f) provides litigants the opportunity to appeal an adverse class certification decision, which the appellate court has unfettered discretion to review or not. [read post]