Search for: "THOMAS P. KENNEDY"
Results 241 - 260
of 405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
I think the answer is that campaign finance regulation comports with all three strands of conservatism that Jeff identifies: Thomas’s Tea Party conservativism, Kennedy’s libertarianism, and the Scalia, Alito, Roberts pro-executive power/pro-business conservatism. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:51 am
Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alioto, and Kagan joined the opinion, and Thomas wrote a concurring opinion. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:15 am
Justice Thomas authored the opinion, and the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito joined. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
. ___ (2011)) Justices Roberts (author), Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan; Breyer (author) and Ginsburg dissented. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
SEB S.A. (131 S.Ct. 458 (2010)) 8-1; Justices Alito (author), Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan; Kennedy dissented. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm
An ideologically unusual coalition of six justices (Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan) chose the middle-ground option. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:53 pm
Justice Kennedy, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Alito, Jr., Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:01 pm
" Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito joined the opinion of Justice Thomas. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:57 pm
En una apretada votación (5-4), la mayoría de los justices –integrada por Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor y Kagan- consideró que el hacinamiento y pésimo servicio de salud del sistema penitenciario del estado de California violaba la prohibición constitucional de imponer castigos inusuales y crueles. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am
Justice Stevens further shared “without reservation” the observation made by the dissent that “‘[p]rosecutorial comment suggesting that a defendant tailored his testimony inverts [a defendant's fair trial rights], permitting the prosecutor to punish the defendant for exercising that which the Constitution guarantees. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
' 36 American Criminal Law Review 87-116 (Winter 1999) at p. 91]. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:52 am
J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, THOMAS, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:27 am
The case was decided along familiar lines, with the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito joining in the Court’s opinion written by Justice Thomas; Justice Ginsburg wrote a dissent in which Justices Breyer and Sotomayor joined (Justice Kagan had recused herself). [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:32 pm
In a judgment delivered on May 6, 2011, Chief Justice Joseph P. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
Thomas & Betts Corp., reached the exact opposite conclusion. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
Briefly: At ACSblog, Rochelle Bobroff highlights the surprising “gang of four” — Justices Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Kennedy) that was part of the majority in two sovereign immunity decisions (VOPA v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:05 pm
” Justice Scalia wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Kennedy, and Thomas (who filed a separate concurring opinion). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:53 pm
Justice Thomas also filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Justice Scalia delivered the 5-4 majority opinion for the Court, in which Justices Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas (who filed a separate concurring opinion) joined. [read post]
