Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 5,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
For many years, before the justices leave town, they hold one last impromptu conference to dispose of all the cases still hanging around after their last scheduled conference, which usually means the unresolved relists. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:49 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Late last week, a former member of the Apex Town Council sued North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore for "alienation of affection" and "criminal conversation," domestic torts claims that are currently recognized in only a handful of states. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The market’s small-town neighborhood atmosphere can occasionally conceal the reality that it is a business district governed by laws established by the Fayetteville City Council and different departments of the state of Arkansas. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 3:37 am by Patricia Salkin
’” Huntley Power v Town of Tonawanda, 2023 WL 3912499 (NYAD 4 Dept.2023) [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Rick Garnett
A short version, though, is that, a little more than 50 years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The town court judge before whom Mr. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am by Frank Cranmer
On behalf of the Secretary of State, the Department for Education agreed with the panel’s recommendation. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a… [read post]