Search for: "Tax Analysis v. Irs"
Results 241 - 260
of 601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
The IRS agreed.The Tax Court looked at the language of section 71 and determined that the payments were alimony. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:05 am
Treasury Department, Office of Tax Analysis), Joint Filing by Same-Sex Couples after Windsor: Characteristics of Married Tax Filers in 2013 and 2014: In June 2013, the Supreme Court invalidated a key provision of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (Windsor v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm
Practice tips for minimizing the risk of an IRS settlement challenge. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:16 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
§2B1.1(b)(11)(C), because this provision does not apply to personal tax returns. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 10:35 am
Duckett v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
A recent case, Belot v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:00 am
Bloomberg BNA, Tax Court Slams IRS ‘Medtronic'Analysis, Says $2B Too Much: The IRS grossly underrated the contributions of Medtronic Inc.'s Puerto Rican affiliate to the quality of the company's products, the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
Though the question of whether a zombie is subject to taxation might seem far-fetched and irrelevant to current tax practice, the treatment of what could be characterized as a “zombie corporation” arose in a recent Tax Court case.In Allied Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 5:01 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:15 am
However, in the recent Arizona case of Duckett v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 11:34 am
(Doyle v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 8:18 am
This analysis demonstrates the significant penalty the tax imposes—especially on the lowest income households who are not exempt. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:16 am
Tax exempt status will carry into future years, however the owner must re-apply if the use of the property changes or ownership is transferred.As discussed last week in this Blog by my colleague Connie Carr in her article: Ohio Supreme Court re Analysis of Property Tax Exemption Under RC 5709.121, “when a property tax exemption is being considered based on the owner being a charity, it is not sufficient to show that the property owner is a 501(C)(3)… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Rural Health applied for a tax exemption on the real property and was denied by the tax commissioner who relied primarily on an earlier Ohio Supreme Court decision, Dialysis Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
