Search for: "Taylor's Administrator v. Taylor"
Results 241 - 260
of 900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
"Pursuant to this duty to negotiate, where a past practice between a public employer and its current employees is established, involving a mandatory subject of negotiation, the Taylor Law would bar the employer from discontinuing that practice without prior negotiation" (Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 331), and "PERB is authorized to determine disputes as to improper employment practices, and to take affirmative… [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Portincasa v Taylor, 2022 ABQB 451 (CanLII) [10] The Counterclaim is explicitly based on rights purporting to originate from the “1st Notice”, and that claims to enforce the effect of the “1st Notice”. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Later, on 16 October 2019, the Advocate General (AG) at the CJEU delivered his much-awaited opinion in the matter Sky v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
And, of course, the new decision makes a dead letter of the Court’s caveat in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 1:06 am
In Holly Wood v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:48 am
In that case, called Roadway Exp., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am
In Thurman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
TAYLOR v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
Franck Vecella described the benefits of the ITC even for SEPs, citing the Apple v Samsung dispute. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
Two separate challenges were before the court on Tuesday, but the justices spent most of their time and energy on the first case, which is known as Biden v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Kappos v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
& Taylor Rest. v New York State Liq. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:48 pm
In Elbert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 12:45 am
Reversing a determination by its administrative law judge [ALJ], PERB ruled that the sheriff and the county were "joint employers" for the purposes of the Taylor Law. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:29 am
Reversing a determination by its administrative law judge [ALJ], PERB ruled that the sheriff and the county were “joint employers” for the purposes of the Taylor Law. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:03 am
The most important opinion generated during the case is here: United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Whren v. [read post]
