Search for: "Texas v. Rodriguez"
Results 241 - 260
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
The problem with the foregoing analysis is a 1989 Supreme Court case that the Jackson court could have cited in favor of its approach but neglected to: Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Nineteen other defendants were arrested in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Florida, and Texas and were expected to appear in federal courts in those states. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
University of Texas at Austin, a challenge to the university's affirmative action program. ? [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm
University of Texas, involving an undergraduate affirmative-action admissions program. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:33 am
RODRIGUEZ, Respondent Decided May 2, 2012 U.S. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm
(forthcoming)Brief of respondent Jose Antonio Rodriguez Menendez in support of certiorari (forthcoming) Bulldog Investors General Partnership v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am
Texas, 1897). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
It held that under Volkswagenwerk AG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:23 pm
SOURCE: TEXAS SUPREME COURT – Salinas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 181 (1990); Limon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 11:05 am
The style of the case is, Farmers Insurance Exchange and Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company v Juan Rodriguez. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:14 am
Case information: Spent v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
"Our side" considered it a loss (I was lobbying for the Innocence Project of Texas on the subject), but the law simply did not give criminal defendants the means to keep eyewitness testimony out of evidence if lineups don't follow written policies, nor if written policies are inadequate.Ironically, though Chief Rodriguez wants to blame the Legislature for his woes, the much more significant penalty for failing to follow best practices was laid down in October by the… [read post]
