Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Surgeon"
Results 241 - 260
of 428
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) I have been considering the issue of of labor cooperatives as a central element of the reform (though quite limited and preliminary) of the Cuban economic system. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Surgeoner, Benjamin Chapman, Randall Phebus and Douglas A. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:17 am
The CEO then told surgeons that she had committed a “heinous crime,” which he later admitted was not true. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
It is estimated that 250,000 people die each year in the United States as a result of medical malpractice according to the U.S. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] How a state dentistry board hounded non-dentist teeth-whiteners out of North Carolina
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Today, I’ll talk about the details of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
See Landrigan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
Product liability is just that, liability for products, and imposing liability on other people’s products turns upside down all the reasons why product liability was created in the first place. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
A week later, Bacon sought treatment with an orthopedic surgeon for complaints of neck and back pain. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:34 pm
Stuart v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:42 am
Vincent v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:44 am
”Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:48 am
That topic is one that might get a lot of people excited, maybe even exercised. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
You can read the entire opinion in the case of Lunskis v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:28 am
See Schweig v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
Eventually there is resignation, and ultimately acceptance and adjustment.New Yorkers are a hearty, tough bunch of people. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
In such cases, an attorney may call for a "Stuart instruction," so called because it comes from the 1977 case Stuart v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
I'm drawn to Scalia's notorious dissenting opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:08 pm
The argument that it does will run into Employment Division v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:49 am
The case is Hubbard v. [read post]
