Search for: "The Review Company v. the United States" Results 241 - 260 of 7,303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am by Christine Corcos
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that two sets of petitioners, hereinafter referred to as "Industry Petitioners" and "Environmental Petitioners," seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule partially approving and partially disapproving the most recent revision to Texas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) pursuant to the Clean… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:08 am by Steven G. Pearl
More surprisingly, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari on April 16, 2012. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:06 am
One of them is a decision by Judge Lindsay of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts from the beginning of the month, Dickerson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:18 pm
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Olsen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:15 pm by Sme
United States of America (10th Cir., Dec. 20, 2016) (denying Split Rail's petition for review of ALJ decision penalizing it for violation of the Immigration Reform and Control Act by illegal hiring and employment of an unauthorized alien)MiscellaneousRusk v. [read post]