Search for: "The University of Chicago v. United States of America"
Results 241 - 260
of 328
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm
United States (1919). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
This post is adapted from a chapter in his book, Rehabilitating Lochner, forthcoming in 2011 from University of Chicago Press. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
Free Expression and Democracy in America: A History (University of Chicago Press, 2008) answers these questions. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP Factor) Bar Ilan University holds premature ‘After Re Bilski’ conference (IP Factor) Latin America Madrid protocol in Latin America: a nightmare or a dream? [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: US Supreme Court refuses to hear Chicago Redskins complaint: Suzan Harjo v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 1:23 pm
We show that, relative to the rest of the United States, South Carolina suffered no statistically significant increase in crime rates. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
