Search for: "Thomas More Law Center v. Obama"
Results 241 - 260
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Alito, Jr., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
For example, in February 2017, Rynearson made a series of public posts on Facebook criticizing the founder of the Bainbridge Island Japanese-American Exclusion Memorial (“Memorial”) for failing to criticize Governor Inslee and President Obama for voting for/signing the NDAA. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
., often says little; Clarence Thomas never says anything. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:08 am
Monday’s sharply divided decision came from a court whose ideological differences are under intense scrutiny after last week’s arguments on President Obama’s health care law. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
This essay was originally published in Administrative & Regulatory Law News, the quarterly magazine of the American Bar Association’s Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:40 am
Supreme Court case decided in 1976, the landmark Buckley v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:40 am
Supreme Court case decided in 1976, the landmark Buckley v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Primary resources In an era when, in response to the excesses of the Bush and Obama administrations, citizens question not simply the wisdom of a given policy but the authority for enacting it, legal commentators find themselves at the center of public discussions that far transcend a think-tank scholar’s typical bailiwick. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
[Ed.: Court notes that the decision is without prejudice to her right to pursue claims under GERA - the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991; for more on GERA see 29 CFR 1603 here]Ø Purchase v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Patent Baristas) (The Invent Blog) RXP keeps on growing as five more companies sign the dotted line (IAM) How patent vulnerability impacts valuation (IP Frontline) Ensuring quality patents through a rigorous review process (IP Frontline) Ocean Tomo, IP Exchange International launch OTI.com for global IP market data (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Research circles, communities of practice and IP consciousness (IP finance) Trade secrets: front and center? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Lowe's Home Improvement Center, No.08-50831 (5th Cir. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
I wonder if Justice Thomas would ask more questions if he was on camera? [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in part, calling the decision “an unprecedented departure from our deferential review of discretionary agency decisions. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Individual Rights Foundation (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of The American Legion (in support of petitioners) Brief amici curiae of Alliance Defense Fund and Thomas More Law Center (in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-1234 Title:… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am
Those two officials are also surely far more sophisticated about FISA than is Whitaker (as I have pointed out, he has said that Marbury v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Energy Safety Servs., Inc., No. 08-1013*ADA - Whether driving is a major life activityØ SCOTUS docket hereØ Noted here: Adjunct Law ProfØ * Petition denied 4-6-09Oakley v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
The second move made by my progressive interlocutors is more serious, and much, much more dismaying. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Justice Kennedy, generally the Court’s ideological center, early on asked: “I understand we must presume laws are constitutional, but even so, when you are changing the relation of the individual to the government in this, what we can stipulate is, I think, a unique way, do you not have a heavy burden of justification to show the authorization under the Constitution” – a question straight out of the Tea Party playbook. [read post]
