Search for: "Thomas v. Big "
Results 241 - 260
of 1,810
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 9:58 am
Anderson were joined by Molly Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news including alleged war crimes committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and Torres v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:41 pm
The Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am
It was a big week for relisted cases. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
The brief contains 7 shoutouts to Justice Thomas, but I wonder if his credibility has taken a hit. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
The Evan Law blog has a summary of the recent decision Allen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:21 am
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
On the heels of former Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas’s indictment and suspension from the city council, the Board of Supervisors voted to conduct the audit to ensure transparency in the county’s contracting procedures, which came into question following Ridley-Thomas’s indictment on federal bribery and conspiracy charges. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
Among the other eight justices, only Justices Thomas and Gorsuch have written substantial antitrust opinions. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
(Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
The question in Hermès v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:16 pm
See, e.g., Ghomeshi v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
This is a big deal beyond the scope of executive privilege claims specifically. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
Justices Thomas, Gorsush and Alito dissent. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Included are the per curiam opinion, the concurrence of JJ Gorsuch, Thomas and Alito, and the dissenting opinion of JJ Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
At that time, four justices – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh – noted that they concurred in the decision to deny review because the factual record was too undeveloped to grant preliminary relief to the coach, emphasizing that they did not “necessarily agree with the decision (much less the opinion) below. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Supreme Court case Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:49 pm
Back in 2019, the Solicitor General filed a powerful brief in Hikma v. [read post]