Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson"
Results 241 - 260
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am
Tomlinson LJ held that, although data protection legislation imposed duties upon controllers, that was insufficient of itself to give rise to a statutory duty for the purposes of the tort of breach of statutory duty: “you cannot derive a common law duty of care directly from a statutory duty” ([73] citing Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank [2007] 181, 200, [2006] UKHL 28 (21 June 2006) [39] (Lord Hoffmann)). [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v… [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Tomlinson, Sixth Circuit: Appellant was convicted by a jury for being a felon in possession of a firearm. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 5:57 am
Tomlinson LJ also took the opportunity to correct his approach in the Happy Ranger [2001] Lloyd’s Rep 530 (which has to be read in light of the Court of Appeal’s decision [2002] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 357). [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Google reviewed the relevant case law on CPR 19.6(1), arguing that the authorities (in particular, Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways plc [2011] Ch 345 and Rendlesham Estates plc. v Barr Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3663) supported its position. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
’ Tomlinson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
Tomlinson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:05 am
An odd appeal on an adverse possession case, of no legal interest per se, but entertaining on the facts.Devanney v LB Hounslow [2012] EWCA Civ 1660 [not on baili yet. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm
Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench News: Tulisa “Sex Tape”, false privacy turns into true privacy The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane La Regina Nuda and Italian Privacy Law – Athalie Matthews and Giacomo Parmigiani Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v Czech Republic:… [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:45 pm
We’ll take it away (then you can make us pay) – Zoe McCallum “Fake” news versus “wrong” news: a nonideological approach to a smarter readership – Charles J Glasser Case Law, Strasbourg: Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania, Fine over “Jesus” and “Mary” advertising campaign, Article 10 violation – Hugh Tomlinson QC Internet legal developments to look out for in 2018 – Graham Smith [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:21 am
I don't remember for sure but it's possible that, whether or not my name was mentioned, I got attacked by him over my pro-copyright positions (Oracle v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
There was one privacy trial, Axon v Ministry of Defence, tried by Nicol J (judgment is awaited), one breach of confidence trial (Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)) and one privacy injunction (PJS v News Group Newspapers). [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:08 pm
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Case Law, Australia: Bleyer v Google Inc, “Search results” libel action stayed as “disproportionate” – Hugh Tomlinson QC [read post]
23 May 2021, 10:09 am
Ms Van Roy was represented by Nigel Tait, Helena Shipman and Katherine Hooley of Carter-Ruck, and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
– Mark Thomson Case Law: Cooper v Turrell – the assessment of damages for libel and misuse of private information – Hugh Tomlinson QC Hemming and Haigh: Freedom of Speech and Abuse of Privilege Opinion: “Role models and hypocrites” – Max Mosley “Harassment and the Media”: Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann Case Law: “Clift v Slough Borough Council – Qualified Privilege meets Article 8″ – Lorna… [read post]
