Search for: "Tower v. Tower" Results 241 - 260 of 2,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division decision, please use this link: Matter of Bridge View Tower, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:41 am by sally
Supreme CourtAdams, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18 (11 May 2011)Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 & Anor [2011] UKSC 19 (11 May 2011)Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Zejmowicz & Anor, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1173 (11 May 2011) Nicholas & Anor v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1175 (11 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)Mahan Air & Anor v Blue Sky One Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ… [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:58 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) O’ Grady Plant and Haulage Ltd & Ors v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2011] EWCA Crim 1339 (27 May 2011) Guthrie & Ors, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1338 (26 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Zurich Insurance Company Plc v Hayward [2011] EWCA Civ 641 (27 May 2011) AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant Llp v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC [2011] EWCA Civ 647 (27 May 2011) JP Morgan Europe Ltd… [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Board of Mgrs. of Brightwater Towers Condominium v SNS Org., Ltd. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 10:56 am by Giles Peaker
No. 1 West India Quay (Residential) Ltd v East Tower Apartments Ltd (2021) EWCA Civ 1119 This was a second appeal to the Court of Appeal from the Upper Tribunal on two issues arising from long running litigation between the freeholder, West India Quay and the head lessee, East Tower Apartments (ETAL) on the arrangements for and charging for utilities for the residential parts of the building (a 33 storey tower, including a hotel). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Katherine A. Campbell
The case of No.1 West India Quay (Residential) Ltd v East Tower Apartments Ltd surprised the legal profession in 2016 when the court held that one bad reason for refusing consent to assign a lease effectively trumped two other good reasons, making the landlord’s refusal unreasonable. [read post]