Search for: "U Rule Music"
Results 241 - 260
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2011, 9:24 am
And even if the talk might be overblown, the possibility of default by multiple local governments or even state governments — which might someday get the ability to declare bankruptcy — can’t be ruled out.If municipal bankruptcies start popping up all over the place, Dewey & LeBoeuf will be ready. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
Tenenbaum (Electronic Frontier Foundation) U S Copyright Group – Downloaded ‘The Expendables’ on BitTorrent? [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 4:32 am
Come on, Max… you know how this one goes… Sing it with me… (Open the link above in a new window, and the music will accompany the words.) ~~~ Will the circle, be unbroken, By and by, Lord, by and by. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
We agree the Final Rule unacceptably alters transactions the EPA approved under the 2003 Rule, and we therefore vacate the Final Rule in part and remand it to the EPA. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
" Music Row Law's Barry Neil Shrum looks at a P2P decision from here in New York: The Limewire Ruling: New King of the Hill for Illegal Downloading Decisions "The U. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
The Plaintiffs could request music, but the music was ultimately controlled by the Defendant. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) refuses to sell Dan Ackroyd's Crystal Head brand vodka (Patent Librarian's Notebook) Costa Rica Costa Rica: taking advantage of Trade Agreements (IP tango) Europe The EU patent and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – TFEU (IP:JUR) Proceedings of the Court of Justice of the European Union on EU Patent (IP:JUR) New ECLA codes for green technologies (Patent Librarian's Notebook) Demystifying the European… [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Poetman Records USA, Inc. 2010 (Copyright Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinios: Party claiming copyright ownership not a rule 19 necessary party: Zimnicki v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:50 am
I will be presenting on the prehearing process and on ruling on objections.So there it is, please stop and say hello if you will be nearby. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:46 am
u=3z04xw techdirt asks "why do people keep insisting that google has a better idea what's infringing than viacom? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Circuit Court’s ruling in April in Kiyemba v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway Feast Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway Feast Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
U. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:21 am
Plaintiff alleged that defendants, including the musical group Destiny's Child and its members, infringed plaintiffs' copyrights in his song "Cater 2 U" by producing and selling Destiny's Child's song of the same name (watch the video of Destiny's Child's version on their website). [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
District Court Judge Nancy Gertner has entered the judgement in her new ruling and has not reduced the verdict, as Tenenbaum's team had hoped. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:44 am
Plaintiff alleges that defendants, including the musical group Destiny's Child and its members, infringed plaintiffs' copyrights in his song "Cater 2 U" by producing and selling Destiny's Child's song of the same name (watch the video of Destiny's Child's version on their website). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:05 am
Chris Graham: Well a proceeding under Rule 1.03 of the Rules of Civil Procedure is defined as an action or an application. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 2:33 pm
This time a Dutch court ordered The Pirate Bay's founders to remove all links to the material of a group of Dutch music and film makers. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:42 am
However, that is no longer the rule. [read post]
