Search for: "U. S. Patent Office" Results 241 - 260 of 705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am by Kevin Goldberg
It’s actually pronounced “F-U-C-T” clearly reads differently, which is why the application filed by Brunetti to register the term as a trademark in connection with various types of clothing and accessories was initially rejected by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (who deemed it “totally vulgar”) and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) (who declared the mark to be “highly offensive, vulgar,” and… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 10:00 pm
Mohrhauser On July 2, 2019, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) released a rule related to foreign-domiciled trademark applicants, registrants, and parties to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) proceedings. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm by Mark Nieds
In 2017, Brunetti filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to register the trademark representing this brand—FUCT (“Friends U Can’t Trust”). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:31 am by Timothy B. Lee
" Beyond that, the US Patent and Trademark Office looked at the products being sold under the FUCT mark. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Wendy R. Stein and Tryn T. Stimart
The court reasoned that PPC’s misappropriation claims could be resolved without analysis of patent rights and that given U Mass’s sovereign immunity, it was likely that PPC would not have an adequate remedy against the defendant if U Mass was considered an indispensable party. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Postal Service petitioned for ex parte reexamination of the patent, but the Patent Office confirmed the patents validity. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:38 am by Dan Harris
The below is China’s White Paper on the US-China trade dispute, as put out by China’s State Council Information Office. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:15 am by Enrica Bruno
By the time feedback is received from the foreign patent offices, it will be too late to make any adjustments, and important aspects of the invention may inadvertently be lost. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
The court concluded that, based on the parties’ “vehement” disagreement on issues “critical to the Company’s management and business strategy,” and the “Veto Rights that apply by default to any action of the Board and consent rights that apply to officer-level decisions,” dissolution is a “foregone conclusion” unless the deadlock resolution provision “provides a viable mechanism to make it reasonably practicable… [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“[U]sers can easily create specific searches, including all Sherlock Holmes works posted in 2018 that are exactly 221 words long and Lord of The Rings/Game of Thrones crossovers that don't include either Frodo Baggins or Arya Stark. [read post]