Search for: "U. S. v. Brand" Results 241 - 260 of 386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Brand X Internet Services? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Us registration for THE for clothing and other merchandise by putting THE on a hangtag. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Amici express no opinion on the procedural questions raised in Part IV of McCauley's brief.) [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
Commercial payors have also raised concerns over the prevalence of manufacturer copay coupons for branded drugs for which cheaper generic equivalents are available. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:09 am by gmlevine
” Although not quite apropos, but emphasizing that benefit of the doubt favors the respondent is the Panel’s observation in Quester Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Background: The Breach of Target’s Security Target is based in Minneapolis and has almost 1,800 stores in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]