Search for: "U. S. v. Quick"
Results 241 - 260
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 6:53 am
Or can u? [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
U. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Cornell U)As written about Terry v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Moreover, a contractual provision setting a deadline will generally be more amenable to quick and efficient application and enforcement because it is likely unambiguous and the relevant facts are measured in days or months. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
Sindermann, 408 U. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
Here’s a quick recap of the case as it unfolded at the trial level. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
United States, 167 U. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 8:16 am
Wisdom Import Sales Co., L.L.C. v Labatt Brewing Co., Ltd., 339 F3d 101 [2d Cir 2003] [“bargained-for minority right to participate in corporate management has value in and of itself and a denial of that right, without more, can give rise to irreparable harm”]; Louis Foodservice Corp. v Vouyiouklis, 2002 NY Slip Op 50448 [U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2002] [“It is well-settled that plaintiffs’ alleged harm, an opportunity for defendants to shift the… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 1:01 pm
The Plaintiff’s vehicle was rear-ended by a u-haul truck. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Hence, all the more reason to take a quick look at the PI requirements in four leading patent litigation jurisdictions. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Minn 2023), available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-agri-stats-inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
ESG’s quick demise. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
Washington, 466 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Mark S. [read post]
