Search for: "U.S. v. McConnell"
Results 241 - 260
of 507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” And in Consumers Union v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:23 am
This suggestion is supported in a number of friend-of-the-court briefs filed by Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:54 am
• McConnell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
The district court denied the preliminary injunction, but the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
ObamaKlayman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
Circuit reached opposite results, and U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 9:25 pm
Jim Bunning (R) beat Daniel Mongiardo (D) by a mere 22,652 votes, you can sprinkle your barroom analysis with insights like "if Lunsford runs up a margin of more than 64,000 votes in Jefferson County, then McConnell needs to win big in the [Jackson] Purchase. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
New plot twist: CFPB agrees its structure is unconstitutional; Ballard Spahr to hold Oct. 22 webinar
19 Sep 2019, 10:36 am
The announcement was made in identical letters sent by Director Kraninger to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:01 am
The cases then went to the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
See McConnell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Sims to Bush v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
What if Mitch McConnell gave Obama's Supreme Court choice, Merrick Garland, an up-and-down vote? [read post]
7 May 2015, 2:23 pm
The ruling in ACLU v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:14 am
But the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the legislative veto in INS v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:01 am
” At Casetext, David Boyle argues that current events show “that this may not be a good time for the Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
