Search for: "U.S. v. Potter*"
Results 241 - 260
of 386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Birmingham Board of Education, 544 U.S. 167 (2005) (Title IX); CBOCS West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
WASHINGTON - U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
Indeed, the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:51 am
A federal court in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds yesterday’s U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:05 pm
In a shocking -- shocking -- development, the Ninth Circuit this morning held that the possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking is not protected by the Second Amendment.Yet another example of the wacky, uber-left Ninth Circuit going out of its way to undermine the core constitutional rights of American citizens. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:27 pm
., with support from the U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:22 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Shira Sheindlin has dismissed a copyright infringement claim against the U.S. publisher of J.K. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:01 am
This ruling will be appealed to the U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:04 pm
WSJ Law Blog (Dec. 29, 2010) WSJ: U.S. to Appeal (Dec. 15, 2010) WSJ Law Blog: The Day After the Big Health Care Ruling (Dec. 14, 2010) TPM: Talking Points Memo (briefly quoting Volokh Conspiracy bloggers Profs. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm
’ (Jacobellis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
” As of today the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
In another case this week, AT&T v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:31 am
This is, according to a lawsuit, the fault of the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
Martin Jr. of the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
In MELNICK v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982))There are many court cases surrounding the right to read; one of the more recent ones is from 2003, Counts v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am
The suit, Mesa Water, L.P. and G&J Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
