Search for: "U.S. v. Quinn*"
Results 241 - 260
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2012, 12:11 pm
Nor does the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:18 am
., L.L.C. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm
Meet the two parties to the case in question: Schweitzer-Mauduit (SWM) from the U.S. and Julius Glatz from Germany. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
But the purpose here is not to predict the U.S. outcome on "slide to unlock". [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm
Apple Samsung verdict expected soon… Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Apple, Apple v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In Grutter v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:23 am
Kizer, 485 U.S. 386 (1988)). [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
The court didn't conclude that they're entirely innocent, but didn't identify a whole lot of guilt either.If you're interested in more detail, here's the 19-page order: 14-01-29 Apple v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:35 am
Halliburton/KBR | Halliburton/KBR Sues Jones to Recover Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Aug. 22) Federal Circuit Unveils Model Order on E-Discovery in Patent Cases (Oct. 3) KPMG LLP v Cocchi | U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In the Apple v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:28 am
The long-running Samsung case is an exception for whatever reason (it's hard to see, without inside-baseball type of knowledge that I lack, why they can't just all sit down, perform a realistic probablistic analysis together, and agree on a payment based on a weighted average of different scenarios).Other than what I just mentioned, today's hearing was not as informative as the two Qualcomm v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
But now, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:16 am
an agnostic patent injunction when professional judges in the U.S. actually agreed with what was Apple's primary non-infringement argument. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2016 U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:34 am
Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). [read post]
