Search for: "U.S. v. Strickland"
Results 241 - 260
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Strickland v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel will be controlled by Strickland v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel will be controlled by Strickland v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:45 pm
Ct. 1194 (1963), and Strickland v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:07 pm
Allison, 431 U.S. 63 Then we come to Hill v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 10:16 pm
Qualls, 2008 U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:34 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice 'Strickland' Not Met in Colombian Drug Trafficker's Bid For Habeas Relief From Sentence on Guilty Plea Valencia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:39 pm
April 2018 Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:17 am
Ed. 2d 657 (1984), or, in the alternative, that he had failed to show deficient performance and prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004), and confirmed in Hill v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
No. 1:09cv00700), filed in U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:20 pm
Under the landmark case of Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
Additionally, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly analyzed the prejudice prong, as established by Strickland v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:22 am
Abrahamson (U.S. 1993)], because '[t]he Strickland [v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
[I]t is apparent both that the claim of ineffective assistance was exhausted in the military courts and that it was briefed under the correct legal standard, namely, Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:36 pm
’” Id. at 307 (quoting Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
The Georgia Attorney General counters in his opp that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision is correct under a straightforward application of Strickland v. [read post]
